Expansion of Soviet Territory through Terror and War

The Bolshevik Invasions

Source: Unknown Source, this may be a snippet from "The Truth About Communism" narrated by Ronald Reagan.
Video obtained through YouTube.
Apologies for the uploader's comments maligning "Jews" for these atrocities and warmongering. In actuality, to be a member of the Communist Party one must submit themselves to Atheism. Especially the atrocities committed by such high-level ranking Communist criminals, these were Atheists. Therefore, this lie created by Atheistic rightwing socialists (nazis) has no basis in actual historical fact or communist policy. My sincerest apologies to any viewers who faithfully practice the religion Judaism. Jews were murdered in Western Europe by Socialists, and Christians were murdered in Eastern Europe/USSR by Socialists. Jews were murdered in Eastern Europe and USSR by Socialists and Christians were murdered by Socialists in Western Europe. Obviously Socialists do their Atheistic evils and genocide in the name of religion, though all sides, esp. top ranking officials are vehemently amoral and anti-religious at heart.

Communist Tactics

Source: Unknown, retrieved from YouTube

Communist Terror

Source: Unknown, retrieved from YouTube

Estonians Tortured

Source: Unknown, retrieved from YouTube

Handed Over To Communism

Source: Unknown, retrieved from YouTube,
This clip followed the ending of World War II where captive refugees whom had fled Soviet Territory were handed over to the Soviet Union by the Allied Forces. Some preferred suicide than to live under Communist tyranny.

To Become A Communist You Must Be Atheist

CPC members 'must be atheist'
Communist Party "Must Be Atheist"
A senior member of the Communist Party of China has spoken out on Party members having religious beliefs, slamming them as incompatible with the CPC's founding philosophy.
Zhu Weiqun, executive vice minister of the United Front Work Department of the CPC Central Committee, released an article in Qiushi Journal, a magazine devoted to policymaking and theoretical studies.
The article stated that an increasing number of Communist Party members were found to be religious and in contact with religious leaders.
According to Zhu, some within the Party have said the ban of CPC members being openly religious should be lifted. A number of reasons and benefits for CPC members to be able to be open about their faiths have been given, with some saying the ban is unconstitutional, Zhu said.
Zhu denied the above statements by saying that the CPC's use of Marxism and all its theories, ideas and actions as a guide is based on dialectical materialism.
The Party will be divided ideologically and theoretically if members are allowed to be openly religious, as it would force unworkable perspectives, such as idealism and materialism or theism and atheism, to coexist, compromising the guiding role of Marxism.
Besides, if a Party member takes an active part in religious activities or uses their position to protect some illegal religious activities, they will be driven out of the Communist Party, said Zhu.
The article further put forward methods to manage various religious activities in society, such as promoting effective management of religious groups and encouraging atheism in non-religious schools.
Zhu said these methods will not conflict with the public's freedom to worship.
"The Constitution of the Communist Party requires every Party member to be an atheist, and this is a principle that every Party member should obey," Qi Pan, a Party member from Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, told the Global Times.

---

State atheism is the official "promotion of atheism" by a government, sometimes combined with active suppression of religious freedom and practice.[1] In contrast, a secular state purports to be officially neutral in matters of religion, supporting neither religion nor irreligion.[2] Atheism is either the lack of belief in a deity or the belief that none exist,[3] and forms a binary pair with theism,[4] which is the belief that at least one deity exists.[5][6] Atheists have offered various rationales for not believing in any deity, but there is no one ideology or set of behaviors to which all atheists adhere.[7] Furthermore, atheism figures in to certain religious and spiritual belief systems, such as Jainism, Buddhism, Hinduism, and Neopagan movements[8] such as Wicca.[9]
Wikipedia: State Atheism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_atheism

So much for separation of church and state, eh?

---

China party official warns members over religion
AP – Mon, Dec 19, 2011BEIJING (AP) — Religious practice among Chinese Communist Party members is increasing and threatens its unity and national leadership, a top party official said in remarks reported Monday.
Party members are required to be atheists and must not believe in religion or engage in religious practice, said Zhu Weiqun, a member of the party's Central Committee and executive vice director of its United Front Work Department in charge of dealings with nonparty groups.
Religious practice is a growing trend, especially in areas inhabited by ethnic minorities, and must not be tolerated, Zhu said in comments published in the latest edition of the main party theoretical journal, Qiushi, and reported by the official Xinhua News Agency.
"Voices have appeared within the party calling for an end to the ban on religion, arguing in favor of the benefits of religion for party members and even claiming the ban on religion for party members is unconstitutional," Zhu said.
"In fact, our party's principled stance regarding forbidding members from believing in religion has not changed one iota," he said.
Zhu's stern remarks to the party's 80 million members come amid a spike in tensions between Beijing and the Vatican and crackdowns on independent churches, Tibetan Buddhist monasteries and religious practice among Turkic Uighur Muslims in the northwestern region of Xinjiang.
The party ban on religious practice frequently also applies to all public servants and sometimes students, especially in minority areas such as Tibet and Xinjiang.
While it no longer actively works to eradicate religion as it did under Mao Zedong, the party remains deeply suspicious of religious practice and strictly controls when and where it can take place.
Churches must belong to official Protestant and Catholic religious associations, Imams must submit their sermons for vetting and Buddhist monks are forced to attend tedious and time consuming political indoctrination sessions demonizing Tibet's exiled spiritual leader, the Dalai Lama.
Yahoo News, Chinese Communist Party Official Warns Members Over Religion

That's what I call a democratic and free society!

---

August 15, 2011 12:39 pm
Mass Murderer Jim Jones: Religious Extremist or Atheist Stalinist?
Answer: What’s Best for the New York Times?

...By a revolutionary communist who decried Western capitalism as the sources of all evil? Jones was clearly emulating or coordinating with other radical terrorists of the day...or any of the other communist revolutionaries who were setting bombs and hijacking planes at the same time when communist revolutionary Jones was planning to set bombs and hijack planes.
One would be incorrect. The Times article identifies only one inspiration for Jones’ murderous intentions: religion.

On Jim Jones’ Agenda, A Prequel to Sept. 11 By SCOTT JAMES Published: August 12, 2011 Twenty-five years before the Sept. 11 attacks in 2001, a religious extremist plotted to hijack a commercial airliner — filled with 200 or so unsuspecting passengers — and deliberately crash it. The target was San Francisco. And the would-be perpetrator was not a jihadist, but the man who would become one of history’s more infamous villains: the cult leader Jim Jones of the Peoples Temple, whose headquarters was then on Geary Boulevard in San Francisco. With the hijacking plot, described in a coming book and recently confirmed by a former Peoples Temple leader, Mr. Jones is said to have wanted to cause death on a scale that the world would not soon forget. He called it “revolutionary suicide,” a warped vision of religious martyrdom . .

I hate to side with Jim Jones here, but when Jones talked about “revolutionary suicide,” he actually meant revolutionary suicide, not religious martyrdom. Sure, like most cult leaders, he used the trappings of religion (except when he didn’t), but what he preached was “apostolic socialism,” which he specifically presented to his followers as the antidote to religion. And he convinced his followers to kill themselves (those who weren’t murdered by others) not by promising paradise but by telling them that they should choose death over violent persecution by America.
Jones was an atheist, card-carrying member of the Communist Party who split with the CPUSA only when they grew a little sour on his lifelong personal hero, Joseph Stalin. He hobnobbed with other communist radicals like Angela Davis; broke bread with militants from the Nation of Islam, and lifted the term “revolutionary suicide” from Black Panther Huey P. Newton, who lost family members at Jonestown. Jones called Jonestown the “purest communist” settlement on earth, and after he forced the mass suicide/homicide of more than 900 of his followers, he left documents deeding his and their assets to the Communist Party of the Soviet Union.
In other words, he worshiped Joseph Stalin, not Jesus Christ. Literally. And he was not shy about saying so.
http://crimevictimsmediareport.com/?p=4206

I suppose Atheists will now attempt to argue since somebody says Jim Jones (an Atheist) worshipped Joseph Stalin (another Atheist) that makes Jones a Theist.

The article goes on to say,

Why would the Times scrupulously avoid so many facts? Take your pick:
There is the paper’s own shameful coverup of Stalin’s crimes, perpetrated by their Moscow Bureau Chief Editor, Walter Duranty. Who wants to mention Stalin as Jones’ primary influence and raise all that embarrassment and kerfuffle, when you can just vaguely point at the Bible-thumpers and hope Jim Jones’ Wikipedia entry is down for the day?
http://crimevictimsmediareport.com/?p=4206

---

China’s official Xinhua News Agency reports that a senior Chinese Communist Party official has reminded the increasingly religious ranks of the Party what they’re required to believe. From China party official warns members over religion (AP)
“Religious practice among Chinese Communist Party members is increasing and threatens its unity and national leadership, a top party official said in remarks reported Monday.
“Party members are required to be atheists and must not believe in religion or engage in religious practice, said Zhu Weiqun, a member of the party’s Central Committee [...]
“”Voices have appeared within the party calling for an end to the ban on religion, arguing in favor of the benefits of religion for party members and even claiming the ban on religion for party members is unconstitutional,” Zhu said.” In fact, our party’s principled stance regarding forbidding members from believing in religion has not changed one iota,” he said.”
Chinese Communist Party getting too religious, senior Party official reminds members to believe what they’re told

Now, that's "Atheist Freethought Today"!!

Putting A Face on the Nature of Communism

“On Holy Thursday of 1923, Msgr. Budkiewicz was martyred with frightful cruelty. Brutally pushed across a dark corridor, he fell and broke his leg… Stripped of his clothes and no longer able to walk, the martyr was dragged by the ears all the way to the detachment of guards. One of his ears had been severed. In the gaping hole, he was given a revolver shot. Father Walsh… heard the shot ring out among shouts, drunken singing and bursts of laughter. So that no relics would remain, the martyr’s body was burned and his ashes dispersed. And this was the signal for a series of attacks against the hierarchy, clergy and laity, many of whom were sent to the icy prisons of Solowki on the Black Sea, where a concentration camp was specially assigned for Christians; others died in prison, some of them reduced to madness by the torments they had endured.” (WTAF, Vol. 2, pp. 576-577)

Now I wonder why nobody likes Communists and their Anarchist Agitators.

Pope Pius XI, Letter to Cardinal Pompili, Feb. 2, 1930: “This past year during the Christmas holy days, not only were hundreds of churches [in Russia] closed, great numbers of icons burned, all workers and schoolchildren compelled to work and Sundays suppressed, but they even compelled factory workers, both men and women, to sign a declaration of formal apostasy and hatred against God, or else be deprived of their bread rationing cards, without which every inhabitant of this poor country is reduced to dying of hunger, misery and cold.

Among other things, in all the cities and in many villages… during the Christmas holy days last year: they witnessed a procession of tanks manned by numerous ruffians clad with sacred vestments, taking the cross in derision and spitting upon it while other armored cars transported huge Christmas trees, from which marionettes representing Catholic and Orthodox bishops were hung by the neck. In the center of the city, other young hoodlums committed all sorts of sacrileges against the cross.” (quoted in WTAF, Vol. 2, p. 539)

Here we see "good communists" in action, making society a better place to live. "Peace! Peace!" is their battle cry.

In 1917, Lenin closed all Catholic churches in Petrograd (Warren H. Carroll, The Rise and Fall of the Communist Revolution, p. 169)

In 1918, Lenin shut down all newspapers in Moscow except those published by the Communists. This was soon extended to all printed material, including periodicals, etc. (Warren H. Carroll, The Rise and Fall of the Communist Revolution, p. 116)

“In 1918, one could read the following words in the official organ of the Soviet of Petrograd: ‘We will render our hearts cruel, harsh, without pity. We will open the dams of this bloody sea. Without pity, without mercy, we will kill our enemies by the thousands. We will drown them in their own blood.” (WTAF, Vol. 2, p. 454)

A decree of February 26, 1922 confiscated all the treasures of the Church, including consecrated objects. At the same time, and this was still the very early stage of the Bolshevik horrors, Cardinal Mercier published the first figures of the persecution: “Statistics for the victims of the persecution are frightening. Since November 1917, 260,000 simple soldier prisoners and 54,000 officers; 18,000 landed proprietors; 35,000 ‘intellectuals’; 192,000 workers; 815,000 peasants; 28 bishops and 1,215 priests were put to death.” (WTAF, Vol. 2, p. 451)

Things were so bad in Russia in 1922, that Pope Pius XI published the apostolic letter Annus Fere, ordering a general collection in favor of the starving Russian people. In it, he spoke of the horrors suffered by the Russian people. Though he didn’t denounce the satanic Communist regime in Russia by name, Pius XI spoke of “the extreme misery of the Russian people, who were decimated by disease and famine, victims of the greatest calamity in history…” (WTAF, Vol. 2, p. 565)

"Those Peace Loving Communists"

Shortly after taking over Russia, in 1919 Lenin established the Gulag. The Gulag was a network of concentration camps to which all “enemies” of the State could be sent.”
Consecreation of Russia

Index

Anti Communist Home Dedicated to Religious Persecution of all kinds, committed by the Bolsheviks and Communist regimes that have plagued mankind for decades, since the time of Karl Marx. Researching and exposing the massacres and mass human exploitation in the name of Communism. Photos of Church Remains Bolsheviks Persecution of the Church Testimony and photos of remains of Church in Zinkiv, Ukraine destroyed by the Bolshevik regime in its Atheistical terror. The Russian Revolution, the Bolsheviks and their aims to seize world power and spread of Communism. Stalin's Denial of the Katyn Massacre to the Roosevelt and Allies Stalin's letter of denial for the Katyn Massacre. According to documents released by the Soviet Union in 1992, were carried out because Beria and Stalin believed that the officers were potential enemies of the Soviet Union. Katyn Massacre The 1940 Massacre at Katyn by Stalin and high command, against 22,000 Polish Officers. The Germans discovered the mass grave in 1943, but were blamed for the atrocity due to Allied and Soviet denials, despite Red Cross confirming Soviets were to blame.

Evils Under Communism KGB_Gas_Chamber_01.jpg, 59 K "Gas chamber at the [Marxist/Communist] KGB Headquarters in Vilnius. Under the glass panels there were items from people that perished here." Photo Source: Trip from 2005, Liako KGB_Gas_Chamber_02.jpg, 91 K What it looked like on the other side of the Iron Curtain Victims of the Third... International! You read that right. Not Third Reich victims, but "Third International" or Communist Party victims which the ADL has repetitively and consistantly denied existed. The reason many call it a "Jewish Conspiracy," is simply because many of the leading figures were ATHEIST Jews. Like Karl Marx, one suspects the ADL itself is anti-semitic, with Marx's hatred of Jews, and the ADL's silence on Communist persecution of Jews who want to practice Judaism. Communist Jews are atheistical and have no love for religion, including Judaism.

Have you heard? Jim Jones and Jonestown - Devolution from Political Force to Revolutionary Suicide The Peoples Temple and Jim Jones devolve in 1976 from a San Francisco political juggernaut secretly harboring designs of world communist revolution to, in 1978, a paranoid North Korean-style enclave in Jonestown. There, they negotiate with the Soviet Union, North Korea and others for a possible exodus. A Soviet delegation visits Jonestown, showering it with praise. Captured on audio, three weeks before Congressman Ryan, NBC and others visit, they vote to commit Revolutionary Suicide to further the cause of Marxist-Leninism. The day before Congressman Ryan arrives, Jones announced to Jonestown (and recorded on tape) he's not passing up the opportunity to shoot him. Two days later, they do precisely as Jones had claimed: The Temple's "Red Brigade" killed Ryan and four others. The only murder of a Congressman in the line of duty in U.S. history. Popular NBC reporter Don Harris is also murdered. Then, just as the Temple had voted three weeks before, over 900 members commit Revolutionary Suicide -- the largest death toll of American civilians in a non-natural disaster until 9-11. They die in a "White Night" -- an emergency meeting of the Temple to discuss options to prevent takeover by outside forces. Jonestown had 84 White Nights before the final one. This video has been secured from deletion from youtube, with embedding code at this link, Rev. Jim Jones was not an evangelical Christian. He was a sworn Communist and Atheist. The original author's video on youtube has been at this link. Jim Jones, leader of the mass suicidal "People's Temple" : "I decided how can I demonstrate my Marxism? The thought was, infiltrate the church." Jim Jones and Jonestown - Devolution from Political Force to Revolutionary Suicide <embed src="http://www.anti-communist.net/mediaplayer.swf" width="320" height="260" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" flashvars="height=260&width=320&file=http://www.anti-communist.net/jim_jones/revolutionary_suicide.flv&image=http://www.anti-communist.net/jim_jones/revolutionary_suicide.jpg"></embed>

More on the Double Standards in favor for Communists -- Why? Hitler's anti-semitism? Try Karl Marx' atheistical anti-semitism. So, it is no surprise that Stalin had anti-semitic policies which had true Jews murdered. Communism is atheistical in its nature. Marx put it upon the Jews to divorce themselves from Judaism (read below). Further illustrating Internationalism or Communism was not a "jewish conspiracy," but an atheistical movement. JSTOR: The Jewish Question about Marx The author of this article argues that so narrow a reading is unfortunate, in part because Marx's anti-semitic slurs need to be challenged but also because ... links jstore.org Hank Roth: Karl Marx, the Un-Jewish Jew Marx mentions this myth as fact. Marx never changed his anti-Semitic attitude about the Jews. Knowing this, no self-respecting Jew can be a Marxist. .. pnews.org/art/1art/KARLmarx.shtml Amazon.com: "Karl Marx - Vicious Racist and Anti-Semite" A list of products including, Karl Marx, racist, Requiem for Marx, ... Discusses Marx's anti-Semitic Socialist predecessors, Fichte, St. Simon, Fourier, ... amazon.com, Karl-Marx-Vicious-Racist-Anti-Semite ope-l-0202: [OPE-L:6494] Re: Marx and the bible Saul Padover wrote that this was 'Marx's anti-Semitic tag for Lassalle'. I think this is supported by the fact that in all cases when placed in context this ... ricardo.ecn.wfu.edu "Marx's article “On the Jewish Question” was written in 1843, at a time when the political struggle for the acquisition of civic rights by Jews in their respective countries was already well-advanced. The Jewish Question was no longer merely a question of economics, namely, whether Jews should be granted civic rights in exchange for their contribution to the commonwealth of a country. Neither was it a marginal or circumstantial issue of theoretical nature as it appears in John Locke's Letter Concerning Toleration. Starting in Europe with the French Revolution, the attainment of civic rights became the target of a protracted struggle and a turning point in Jewish history. After more than a century of heated discussions on Jews and their condition, a host of different notions was displaced by the famous term “Jewish Emancipation”, thus closing the long history of refinement and conceptual formation of the issue. Thus, in Marx's time “Jewish Emancipation” was already well-established currency in the discourse on the condition of Jews in Europe. It is in this context Marx's opinions about the Jewish Question are perplexing. Isaiah Berlin addresses Marx's account in the following vein: “It is a dull and shallow composition, but it shows Marx in a typical mood: he was determined that the sarcasms and insults, to which some of the notable Jews of his generation, were all their lives a target, so far as he could effect it, never be used to plague him. Consequently he decided to kill the Jewish problem once and for all so far as he was concerned, declaring it to be an unreal subject, invented as a screen for other more pressing questions: a problem which offered no special difficulty, but arose from the general social chaos which demanded to be put in order (Karl Marx, p. 82)” I agree with this verdict, and in what follows I will articulate and explain in what sense Marx killed the Jewish problem. Marx's article was originally intended to counter the claims made by Bruno Bauer - another prominent German thinker of Jewish origin. Bauer stated that Jews could never be emancipated, because of what he called “Jewish narrowness”, in other words, their commitment to the Jewish faith, which is incompatible with the universal aspect of human emancipation. By that he meant that Jews could never be granted the rights of citizens, since they are incapable of playing any political game except their own. Neither can they possibly be granted the rights of man, for to gain them Jews must, just like other sections of society, play the same game to achieve the same goal, i.e., human emancipation. Bauer thought that the acquisition of the rights of citizens and the rights of man are interdependent (to gain the latter it is first necessary to gain rights as an equal player), and he claimed that this was the main factor that made Jewish emancipation impossible. Emancipation requires that Jews, as well any other possible target population, admit (1) their universality, i.e., that they have the same human nature as other nations, and (2) the irrelevance of their religion to their aspirations for political emancipation. Bauer thought that neither of these requirements could be satisfied in the case of the Jews, because they contradict the core beliefs imposed by Jewish religious teachings and everyday Jewish life conducted in accordance with them. Jews would never abandon the tenet of being the chosen people and drop their messianic expectations. Nor would they abandon Judaism as a system of law, and this was precisely the reason, Bauer thought, for the impossibility of liberating the Jews. “No one in Germany is politically emancipated. We are not free ourselves. How shall we liberate you? You Jews are egoists when you claim a special emancipation for yourselves as Jews.” Since Jews would never find a common denominator with non-Jews given the teachings of their history and the meanings of the core concepts held by them, they could never be emancipated. They would never accept Bauer's position that in the struggle for general freedom the wholesale elimination of religion from the political sphere and the removal of religious practices from the public sphere to that of private rights are required. In Marx's response two separate arguments are discerned. Namely, there is a counter-argument against Bauer's view and against those who spoke about the Jews' corrupted nature, which prevented them from being equal and fair players in the political contract. Regarding Bauer, Marx's dictum is this: “It is by no means sufficient to ask: Who should emancipate and who should be emancipated? Criticism has to be concerned with a third question. It must ask: What kind of emancipation is involved and what are the underlying conditions? Criticism of political emancipation itself is primarily the final critique of the Jewish question and its true resolution into the 'universal question of the age'.” (pp. 220-221) “Bauer asks the Jews: Have you the right to demand political emancipation from your standpoint? We ask on the contrary: Has the standpoint of political emancipation the right to demand from the Jews the abolishment of Judaism and from man the abolishment of religion?” (p. 221) There are two separate counter-arguments advanced by Marx against Bauer's position. The first claims that the existence of religion is not incompatible with the full development of the state, and that the criteria for the acquisition of civic rights in a truly political state should not include any demands regarding one's religion. Marx takes the case of North America to buttress this point, and claims that the order of things in the political realm is far from necessary and fixed, as Bauer assumes. As Marx puts it, in those states of America where the Jewish question ceases to be treated theologically the state is foreign to all faiths and the question of political rights is no longer treated as a privilege granted to a minority group either by the good will of a monarch or by a decision of a majority defined by its commitment to a religion. The second counter-argument deals with the general issue of human emancipation: it explains “what it is like to be humanly emancipated” and shows how human emancipation is connected to political emancipation. Starting from the bottom line of Marx's resolution of the Jewish question, his immediate message to the Jews is this: “We thus do not say with Bauer to the Jews: You cannot be politically emancipated without emancipating yourselves from Judaism. Rather we tell them: Because you can be emancipated politically without completely and fully renouncing Judaism, political emancipation by itself is not human emancipation. If you Jews want to be politically emancipated without emancipating yourselves humanly, the incompleteness and contradiction lies not only in you but in the essence and category of political emancipation” (p. 232) hagshama.org.il/en/resources/view.asp?id=888 Communism and Atheism just another stupid intolerant religion... "We must remember history, lest history repeat itself." Right? Well, here is history repeating itself. Marx put it upon the Jews to divorce themselves from Judaism (read below). Starting from the bottom line of Marx's resolution of the Jewish question, his immediate message to the Jews is this: “We thus do not say with Bauer to the Jews: You cannot be politically emancipated without emancipating yourselves from Judaism. Rather we tell them: Because you can be emancipated politically without completely and fully renouncing Judaism, political emancipation by itself is not human emancipation. If you Jews want to be politically emancipated without emancipating yourselves humanly, the incompleteness and contradiction lies not only in you but in the essence and category of political emancipation” (p. 232)hagshama.org.il/en/resources/view.asp?id=888 I know somebody else, who wanted to force the Jews to denounce their faith... Alhambra decree - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Hundreds of thousands of Jews eventually left Spain after the decree was issued, though many thousand more chose to convert to Christianity and remain in ... en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alhambra_decree About Isabella I of Spain Biography of Queen Isabella I of Spain, with links and illustrations. ... That same year, all Jews in Spain who refused to convert to Christianity were ... womenshistory.about.com/cs/medrenqueens/p/p_isabella_i.htm Out Of Spain They begged them to convert to Christianity, or they would have to leave Spain. Don Isaac Abravanel refused to convert and left with many Jews for Italy. ... outofspainvideo.com/ch5.htm Was Christopher Columbus Jewish Purim is a time for celebration and retelling the story of a Queen who found ... In 1412, a law was passed in Spain depriving Jews and Moslems of the right ... fortunecity.com/millenium The Spanish Expulsion, 1492 Torquemada believed that as long as the Jews remained in Spain, ... Dominican priests actively encouraged Jews to convert to Christianity and thereby gain ... jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Judaism/expulsion.html David Fintz Altabe, "The Significance of 1492..." The Edict of Expulsion signed on March 31, 1492 by Ferdinand and Isabella gave the Jews four months to convert to Christianity or leave Spain under penalty ... facweb.furman.edu/~bensonlloyd/Spain1492.htm True Jews who just want to practice Judaism, never had any peace. Denial of the Obvious? Self-delusion? And on those notes, Marx's rabid atheistical hatred of religious jews who want to practice Judaism.... Here's that article by Winston Churchill, (which the ADL and other Communist Jews, deny as "merely myth") Winston Churchill wrote this article... it was timely, it was a fact of the revolutionary tide sweeping the globe. It was a threat to world peace, and at this time, these revolutionaries had already taken Russia by storm.. but the ADL denies it, as "merely myth". Churchill's words and the title of his article "Struggle for the soul of the Jewish People" are put into clear perspective, upon merely reading Marx' words to the Jews. Do you deny such an obvious truth? AUG 09 1984 UNIVERSITY OF OREGON August 3, 1984 Mr. David Irving 81, Duke Street, Grosvenor Square, London W.1., ENGLAND Dear Mr. Irving: According to Churchill's bibliographer, Frederick Woods, it looks as if Churchill is responsible for the article in the Illustrated Sunday Herald on "Zionism versus bolshevism." You will note that it was part of a series, the sort of writing commission Churchill was fond of accepting. I'm not enough of a Churchill scholar to discuss his stand on Zionism but I will drop these comments... At this time Churchill was again closely associated with Eddie Marsh. Somewhere I read an unverified rumor that at times Eddie Marsh ghosted a Churchill article or two when Churchill was unable to meet a deadline. I wouldn't doubt that Marsh was capable of doing this. Could this piece be one of those? You might also want to look at the ideas expressed. Are they the ideas expressed by T.E. Lawrence whose influence on Churchill could have been direct and indirect via Eddie Marsh? Because as you know Lawrence went to work for Churchill in 1921 and I'm sure they were well acquainted before that. Just an idea. Sincerely yours Richard Heinzkill [...] "Zionism versus Bolshevism" 'A struggle for the soul of the Jewish people' - Winston Churchill fpp.co.uk/bookchapters/WSC/WSCwrote1920.html "It would almost seem as if the gospel of Christ and the gospel of Antichrist were destined to originate among the same people; and that this mystic and mysterious race had been chosen for the supreme manifestations, both of the divine and the diabolical. In violent opposition to all this sphere of Jewish effort rise the schemes of the International Jews. The adherents of this sinister confederacy are mostly men reared up among the unhappy populations of countries where Jews are persecuted on account of their race. Most, if not all, of them have forsaken the faith of their forefathers, and divorced from their minds all spiritual hopes of the next world. This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution, by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews, it is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews.

Winston Churchill actually meant, "...the majority of the leading figures are Atheists."